Trump’s Pick for UN Migration Job Voted Down

Trump’s controversial pick for top UN migration job voted down in Geneva

BY: Zachary Cohen and Elise Labott

Washington (CNN)–The UN migration agency on Friday voted down Ken Isaacs, the Trump administration’s candidate to lead the International Organization for Migration, a US official told CNN, leaving it without an American at the helm for the first time since 1951.

He was eliminated from contention after the second round of voting, a UN source told CNN.
“This was a very competitive election with three highly qualified candidates,” a State Department official told CNN.
“We congratulate the winner and look forward to working with him/her. IOM is an important partner for the United States around the globe, and we are committed to working with IOM to address root causes of migration and to promote safe and legal migration,” the official said.
Isaacs, who works in relief efforts for the Christian nonprofit Samaritan’s Purse, was nominated in February to serve as director general of the 169-member group whose mission is to promote “humane and orderly migration” through assistance to both governments and migrants.
But the agency decided Friday that it will choose a non-American leader for the first time in decades — a move that comes as the Trump administration continues to reduce the number of refugees it accepts into the US every year and push a controversial immigration agenda.
Isaacs himself has also come under scrutiny after a report from CNN’s KFile earlier this year and one from The Washington Post in February revealing he shared anti-Muslim and anti-refugee views on social media.
KFile previously reviewed more than 140 previously unreported tweets from before Isaacs was nominated that provide a wider window into his views of refugees, Islam and climate change — issues that would have been central to the position with IOM.
In several of the unearthed tweets, Isaacs shared a post that called climate change a “hoax,” shared a story from the conspiracy-peddling website InfoWars about the “Clinton body count,” and wrote “#Islam is not peaceful.”
After the February Washington Post report, Isaacs apologized in a statement, saying he “deeply” regretted his comments and adding, “I pledge to hold myself to the highest standards of humanity, human dignity and equality if chosen to lead IOM.”
According to The Associated Press, he told reporters, “I have retweeted many things to stimulate conversation. But at the same time … have never shown discrimination against anybody, for anything.”
But like President Donald Trump, Isaacs has said he supports more restrictive measures on refugees and migrants, once writing on Twitter that Austria and Switzerland should consider building a wall in the Alps to keep refugees out.
“#immigration #wall #Austria #Switzerland consider#buildingawall in #Alps to control their borders from refugees,” the tweet said.
Trump’s road to the White House was paved in part with hardline promises such as building a “great, great wall” along the US-Mexico border and outright banning immigration from any nations “compromised by terrorism.”

Texas Will Close Immigrant Women’s Prison

Texas’ Williamson County Will Close An Immigrant Women’s Prison — But Says That’s Not Enough

By Mehreen Kasana

There’s some good news when it comes to immigration matters in the Lone Star State. On Tuesday, KXAN reported Williamson County in Texas voted to close a prison for immigrant women — an infamous ICE-affiliated detention facility that has previously been accused of overlooking sexual abuse.

In 2016, Williamson County, whose population is predominantly white and conservative, voted for President Trump. The Trump administration is responsible for the present day “zero-tolerance” immigration policy, which has led to nationwide public outrage and increased organizing among activists.

With the help of local organizers, it looks like attitudes have changed in the Lone Star State’s county. On Tuesday, county commissioners voted in majority to terminate the T. Don Hutto Facility’s contract, under the Intergovernmental Services Agreement, with ICE. The county will also end its agreement with CoreCivic — the private company responsible for running the prison. On Jan. 31, 2019, the agreement will officially be over.

One of the commissioners for the county, Terry Cook, released a statement on the development, which Rewire News’ Teddy Wilson shared on Twitter.

Cook stated, “I thank the other members of the Court for voting with me to get ourselves fully focused on the business of the county. Being the go-between for federal agency and a private business on a federal issue such as this is not a core county function. Today’s vote represents the compromise made to get us the necessary three votes to pass.”

The commissioner gave a brief note on celebrating the move. But she placed much more emphasis on the need for activists to waste no time and “redouble” their commitment to the issue of the immigration in the United States. Cook said,

I have appreciated the passion from activists that has been expressed to me and this Court in regards to T. Don Hutto, and while this vote today does not solve the larger issue of immigration, the future of the women detained there, or the closing of the facility, I hope these activists do not celebrate this vote, but redouble their efforts in changing immigration policy at the federal level.

Last year, immigration activist group Grassroots Leadership accused the Williamson County Sheriff’s Office of failing to adequately look into detainee Laura Monterrosa’s accusations of sexual violence. Monterrosa alleged that a T. Don Hutto prison guard had been sexually assaulting her since June 2017.

In response, ICE and Williamson County Sheriff’s Office said that they looked into the allegation. But ultimately both entities said that Monterrosa’s accusation was unsubstantiated and thus could not be further pursued.

Undeterred by ICE and the Williamson County Sheriff’s Office’s response, grassroots activists continued to call on locals to vote to end the private prison. Their demand seemed simple: the mistreatment of the imprisoned women had to stop.

Read the full article here:

Why Women Defy Nepal’s Travel Ban to Take on Domestic Work Overseas

BY ROJITA ADHIKARI– Phurpa Tamang, 36, has been struggling for almost an hour to find a mobile signal in the remote village of Sindhupalchok. He’s trying to make a video call to his wife, Kalpana, in Dubai.

When Phurpa and Kalpana got married around eight years ago, they were farmers. But couldn’t grow enough on their mountain farm in central Nepal to support the family each year.

She was aware of the stories of awful work conditions and abuse brought back by women who had taken jobs in the Gulf. But she felt she had no other choice. In 2014, she left for Dubai.

Now, she is grateful the stories didn’t stop her. She earns $420 a month working as a housemaid for a family that treats her well. She has learned to speak Arabic and has freedom to travel. The money she sends home has been enough to rebuild her family’s house, which was destroyed in the 2015 earthquake, as well as putting some aside for savings.

The job in Dubai has been so good for Kalpana that after taking a few months off to spend time with her family in Nepal, she risked breaking the law to go back. While she had gotten a permit to go to Dubai the first time, her second trip over there was planned after Nepal banned women from traveling to the Gulf for domestic work. For Kalpana, the promise of providing for her family was stronger than the ban, so she returned to Dubai undocumented.

Banned from Becoming Foreign Domestic Workers

 Figures from the Department of Foreign Employment of Nepal show that more than 176,000 Nepali women have been granted labor permits since records started in 2008, traveling mainly to the UAE, Kuwait, Malaysia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Cyprus and Jordan.In response to reports of the abuse of maids in the Gulf, Nepal made it illegal for women to travel to the region for domestic work in 2016. Still, in 2017, more than 20,000 women were given permits to travel for other kinds of jobs, a 8.95 percent increase from the year before. And experts say the number of Nepali women working in foreign countries could be twice as high, as many travel out of Nepal undocumented to circumvent the ban.

Many of these women end up being exploited and return to Nepal worse off than when they left. But other women say migrant work offers them the chance to make good money and learn new skills – opportunities they could never have if they stayed home.

By working abroad to improve the lives of their families, Kalpana Tamang and women like her also benefit their country’s economy: The money they send home contributes to remittances that make up almost 30 percent of Nepal’s gross domestic product.

More than 42 percent of Nepali adult women are illiterate and most are jobless, according to the 2011 national census. But they can find work in places like the Gulf, since domestic work doesn’t require any formal education.

Women who are not able to make money in Nepal can make thousands in the Gulf,” Amina Maharjan, Livelihood Migration Specialist at the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), says. A woman who has never left her village on her own can now move to a foreign country to learn life skills and earn a decent wage, putting her in a position to make her own decisions back home. “This is the biggest change to the condition of women that Nepal has seen over the last decade,” Maharjan says.

It helps explain why so many women are willing to travel for domestic work, despite the horror stories. “Nobody can stop them going – they will go anyway,” Maharjan says.

Mahesh Prasad Dahal, secretary at the Ministry of Labor, says the government is working on signing bilateral agreements and memorandum of understanding with various destination countries with the aim of eventually lifting the domestic work ban. “Once we sign such agreements, we will again allow women to go [to those countries] as housemaids,” he says.

Nepal has already resumed granting work permits for women going to Jordan, after the two countries signed an agreement in October 2017. As part of the deal, Jordan agrees to make sure employers pay their domestic workers a minimum wage of $250 per month, cover necessary medical costs and don’t subject them to forced labor or confiscate their passports. The government says it will fully investigate reports of violence against domestic workers. For its part, Nepal set up support services at its embassy in Jordan for Nepali women who go to the country for work and suffer abuse.

Amina Maharjan, the migration specialist at ICIMOD, says more of these types of agreements are needed to make sure women migrant workers get the benefits of working in a foreign country without suffering the risks.

“When these women have earned some money and enhanced their skills, they will return to Nepal and start doing something effective,” she says.

Read the full article here: